Combating
tool wear with coatings. When will a coating help?
By
Steve Chamberlain
(reprinted
with permission from STAMPING
Journal,
Jan. 16, 2003)
Modern
toolmaking methods and materials have reduced production time, cost,
and headaches significantly over the last 20 years. But the rapid
pace of the tooling revolution, coupled with extremely complex manufacturing
technology, has left many people confused and misinformed.
Today's
high-performance, thin-film tool coatings are designed to prolong
the life of tooling while reducing part marking, lubricant cost
and volume, heat buildup, and maintenance and increasing shelf life,
lubricity, and dimensional control. Coatings can't, however, solve
every tool problem. The best solution depends on the type and cause
of tool wear.
The two main
types of tool wear are surface and substrate.
Surface
Wear
Coatings are
effective when used properly to solve surface problems such as adhesive
and abrasive wear.
Adhesive
Wear. Adhesive wear is the localized bonding of metals,
also known as galling. Galling has two causes: the natural attraction
of like materials to bond and rough surface finish.
Galling often
occurs when D-2 tools are used to work stainless steel. D-2 contains
about 12 percent chrome, which doesn't match well with the 18 to
24 percent chrome in stainless steel. Separating the materials solves
the problem.
The microscopic
surface finish plays a very large role in galling. The surface of
steel may feel smooth, but it isn't. A microscope view shows a mountain
range of sharp ridges and valleys. Small particles of the work material
stick to these tiny scratches and imperfections in the tool surface
and eventually build up to visible galling.
Abrasive
Wear. Abrasive wear is caused by hard particles in the
work material plowing into and through the tool surface. These hard
particles, or carbides, scratch and pit the tool steel because they
are harder. In addition to the naturally occurring carbides, man-made
problems like welded blanks or tubes, burrs, and work hardening
eat away at the steel surface.
Coatings often
can solve both adhesive and abrasive wear simultaneously. Placing
an extremely hard surface barrier between the tool and work material
seals the surface and prevents adhesion. As long as the surface
treatment is pure and very dense, it will prevent hard particles
in the work material from damaging the substrate surface.
Additionally,
coatings often have much lower coefficients of friction than hardened
steel. However, thin-film coatings don't cover up the underlying
surface profile, so critical areas of metal flow must be mirror-finished
before coating. After mirror finishing the part, using a hard coating
will protect it from abrasive and adhesive wear.
Substrate
Wear
Substrate problems,
including fatigue cracking, heat cracking, fracture, and plastic
deformation, often are much more difficult to evaluate.
Fatigue
Cracking and Plastic Deformation. When a tool fails from
fatigue or plastic deformation, the problem probably can't be solved
with coatings alone. Plastic deformation occurs when the compressive
force of the action overwhelms and deforms the tool itself. One
way to overcome fatigue or plastic deformation is to use a harder
steel substrate or reduce the pressure in the operation. The forming
radius causes half of these problems.
The one problem
area that can be improved the most for the least cost and hassle
is the forming radius of a die. When under pressure, metal acts
like a liquid and flows over this radius. Making sure the forming
radius is perfect will increase metal flow and decrease tool stress
and wear. The radius should be opened as much as possible, and it
must be a true radius that is ground correctly. Removing any transitions
or flats and polishing to a mirror finish also helps. A mirror finish
is achieved by finishing the radius by hand with a 900 stone or
diamond paste and a felt bob. Once the radius is perfect, a coating
can keep it in that condition.
Heat
Cracking. Heat cracking of the substrate can be caused
by heat generated when the tool is made or run. If it is caused
by operation, a coating often can help. By decreasing the coefficient
of friction, sealing the surface, and providing a barrier between
like elements, a coating can go a long way toward reducing thermal
stress.
A coating may
help reduce the cost and amount of lubricant required, but reductions
should be incremental and closely monitored. Another good idea is
to use more heat-resistant tool steels, such as M series or particle
metals, in high-stress applications.
Fracturing.
Fracturing, or chipping (see Figure 1),
probably indicates the need for a tougher, not harder, substrate.
Often tools are hardened beyond their capability in an attempt to
prevent surface wear. A high-performance coating that can prevent
surface wear allows underhardening of the substrate, resulting in
a softer but tougher and more durable substrate.

Figure
1
Fracturing, or chipping, may indicate the need
for a tougher, not harder, substrate. Often tools are hardened
beyond their capability in an attempt to prevent surface wear.
|
Cost Factor
Correct tool
design and manufacture are critically important to reducing tool
wear. It is amazing how many toolmakers choose tool steel based
on the cost of the steel. Hundreds of options are available for
tool steel substrates, and most tool and die designers use two or
three a year, at most.
Many shops tend
to use standardized A-2 and D-2 steel because they find it difficult
to keep track of materials and hardening specifications accurately.
Both are excellent general-purpose steels. They are common, and
easy and inexpensive to harden. Unfortunately, some metal forming
problems can't be solved with these materials.
The single most
important factor in selecting steel is the job requirement, not
the initial cost. Nowhere is the old adage "you get what you
pay for" more true than with tool and die. In reality, the
cost of the steel is a tiny fraction of the lifetime tooling cost.
For example,
a block of D-2 may cost $50 and a particle metal block of similar
size may cost $300, for a real cost increase of $250, or 600 percent.
Yes, that will make the accountants sit up and take notice! But
the total tool cost may be $5,000, so the increase in steel cost
really amounts only to 5 percent of the total tool cost. When the
steel is considered as part of a complete die, upgrading the steel
in a few problem areas is cost-effective.
Heat
Treating Options
As much as
toolmakers deal with heat treating, many don't understand it well.
While heat treating is a science and can get complex, the basics
are worth learning. Often companies don't have a specification for
how to treat the tools and never check the hardness or ask for certifications.
Many options are available for heat treating various steels, and
fabricators need to make sure the process they use fits their particular
application.
If persistent
chipping or cracking is the problem, one option is to underharden
the tool. Full hardness for D-2 is 58 to 60 HRC, which is what most
toolmakers use. Small parts can be hardened slightly more, but D-2
becomes brittle higher than 60 HRC.
Many applications
don't require that much hardness. Heat treating D-2 to 55 to 57
HRC usually results in a material with adequate hardness and toughness.
If 55-HRC D-2 forms a good part and doesn't deform but still shows
wear, one option is to add a good coating to increase surface hardness
and reduce wear. If 57 HRC is not enough compressive strength and
the tool shape deforms, the next step might be to move up to a tool
steel that can be hardened safely higher than 61 HRC, such as M
series, modified D-2, or particle metal.
These all can
be underhardened to 58 to 60 HRC to become tough, durable substrates
while providing the extra hardness needed. Sometimes people find
that steel they hated at full hardness is wonderful when underhardened.
If full hardness
is required to address a surface wear problem but not to form the
part, then a coating should be used for the surface wear, and hardness
should become less important. Another trick is stress relieving
the tool. Stresses build up in tooling over time and use and often
show up as large cracks.
Stress relieving
the tool involves retempering it at 25 degrees F below the original
tempering temperature, following standard tempering instructions,
and then allowing the material to cool to room temperature. Doing
this on a regular basis can greatly extend tool life. However, some
tool coatings cannot stand up to high heat.
High-performance,
thin-film coatings can save cost and time if they are used appropriately.
However, coatings are just one part of an overall tooling project.
Other factors include tooling material, proper -- not always maximum
-- hardening, coatings, stress relieving, and examining a tool's
failure mode.
Steve Chamberlain
is a business development manager with the TD Center, 2020
15th Street, Columbus, IN 46220, phone 812-378-1669, fax 812-378-1591.
The TD center supplies pure carbide coatings to automotive, appliance,
furniture, and electrical industries.
|