Guidelines When Using TD Treatment

Vanadium Carbide Layer Supported by Strong Substrate is Tough, Not Brittle

TD Extends Tool Life in Shearing and Piercing Applications

TD Extends Tool Life in Shearing and Piercing Applications

Users in the metal forming industry know that the Thermal Diffusion (TD) tool treatment process greatly reduces wear and significantly increases tool life in comparison to PVD coating. Many in the shearing industry, however, are not aware that TD can reduce wear and extend tool life in shearing and piercing applications.

Some are under the misconception that the extreme hardness of the TD layer (3,500 to 3,800 Vickers) makes it brittle so that it cannot perform well in shearing applications. Not true. The .0002- to .0003-inch thick TD layer adheres so strongly to the substrate that it assumes the toughness of the substrate.

Tests show that even in very severe shearing conditions, such as the production of safety belt buckles, TD works. After 10,000 hits, the cutting edge of shearing punches treated with TD showed only a steady wear of the VC layer. There was no large chipping and spalling.

TiN-PVD coating behavior
Figure 1.

In the test, the behavior of TiN-PVD coated D2 punches,VC-TD treated D2 punches and uncoated D2 punches was observed. All punches were used in piercing, blanking a hard steel, austempered bainitic steel with oxide film, Hv 360. [I. Aoki, K. Hirohito, M. Iino, Journal of Japan Society of Technology of
Plasticity, vol. 30, No. 342, 1997].

TEST RESULTS - Test results revealed that the TD treated punch showed reduced wear on the treated surfaces as well as on the face of the tooling where it was not treated with TD. As a result, the burr height on holes pierced by the TIN coated punch is larger than on holes pierced by the TD treated punch (Figure 1).

Surface and Cross Section Observation
Figure 2.

Observation of the surface and cross section ol the punches after 10,000 showed that the TiN coating at the cutting edge had locally spalled off and the steel substrate had been exposed (Figure 2a). The TD treated punch showed no spalling. The TD treatment on the cutting edge of the punch wore, showing a very smooth contour (Figure 2b). This means there was no chipping or spalling of the VC layer even at the edge of the TD treated tooling.

In the test, the wear of both the TiN coated punch and the TD treated punch was less than that of the uncoated punch. The degree of edge wear after 10,000 hits at both 15% and 5% clearance can be observed in Figure 3.

Test Conditions
Figure 3.

TEST CONDITIONS

  • Steel Coil Size: .6299 inch (16 mm) wide and .0394 inch (1 mm) thick
  • Coatings: Arc Evaporation PVD for TiN and TD for VC
  • Dies: No coating
  • Lubricant: Machine Oil
  • Stroke: 30/min
  • Clearance: 5% and 15%
  • Number of Blankings: 10,000

RESULTS AT 5% CLEARANCE

At 5% clearance, where the loading conditions on the punches is much more severe than at 15% clearance, the difference between TD treated tooling and TiN-PVD Is even more significant.

The closer, 5% clearance produces more severe loading on the punches. Increased force is needed to push the blank into the die and to withdraw the punch from the hole. The longer shearing length also generates more punch side wear. Even under these severe conditions the TD treated punch showed much less wear than the TiN coated punch or the uncoated punch.

The forces encountered with close clearances, especially with hard work materials, can cause other types of damage as well. Here, too, the TD treated punch showed minimum wear. Microscopic observation of the TD treated punch alter 10,600 shots at 5% clearance did, however, reveal damage from cracking and loss of the VC layer on the flank surface of the punch about 0.15mm above the cutting edge (Figure 4).

VC-TD - 5% Clearance - 10,000 Blankings
Figure 4.

This type of damage is formed only when substrates are deformed plastically by an applied stress that is larger than the compression yield strength of the substrate materials. In this instance, the plastic flow and cracking in the substrate were evident.

To address the problems created by severe conditions, it is recommended that higher strength substrate materials, such as high speed steels, super high speed steels and even cemented carbides rather than A2 and D2 be used. The higher strength substrate coupled with TD treatment can help reduce the types of damage discussed above.


TD Center
2020 15th Street, Columbus, IN 47201
Ph: 877-832-3687 • Fax: 812-378-1591